MARATTO

article · Next Materials

Influence of Ni doping on the structural, morphological, optical, and electrochemical behaviors of CeO2 thin films

Abstract

Cerium oxide (CeO 2 ) represents a promising candidate for energy storage owing to its mixed-valence states (Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ ) and outstanding chemical stability. Despite these advantages, its low intrinsic electrical conductivity remains a major obstacle to achieving high electrochemical performance. Nickel incorporation is proposed here as a suitable solution to overcome this limitation and improve the charge storage capacity of CeO 2 thin films. Herein, Ce 1-x Ni x O 2 (x = 0, 3, 5, and 7 at%) thin films were successfully deposited via the spray pyrolysis method onto both glass and ITO-coated glass substrates at 450°C. Structural characterization using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy confirmed the formation of a single-phase cubic fluorite structure, with the characteristic active mode detected at 462 cm −1 . Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) indicated that Ni incorporation significantly modified the morphology of CeO 2 thin films. The UV-Vis-NIR spectra showed high transparency (above 70%) in the visible range, accompanied by a slight decrease in the band gap from 3.34 to 3.24 eV upon Ni doping. Electrochemical tests showed that nickel doping improved the energy storage capacity. Specifically, the sample with 5 at% Ni achieved a specific capacitance of 12.2 Fg −1 at 5 mVs −1 and 45.04 Fg −1 at 0.4 Ag −1 , higher than that of the undoped sample. Additionally, the CNi5 sustained high capacity retention over 100 cycles. These findings indicate that nickel-doped CeO 2 thin films emerge as an efficient electrode material for energy storage applications.

Research topics

  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.103212

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.