article · The Neuroradiology Journal
Objectives To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the proportion of abnormal paediatric neuroimaging findings as a surrogate marker for potential underutilisation. Methods Consecutive paediatric brain MRIs performed between March 27th and June 19th 2019 (T baseline ) and March 23rd and June 1st 2020 (T pandemic ) were reviewed and classified according to presence or absence and type of imaging abnormality, and graded regarding severity on a 5-point Likert scale, where grade 4 was defined as abnormal finding requiring non-urgent intervention and grade 5 was defined as acute illness prompting urgent medical intervention. Non-parametric statistical testing was used to assess for significant differences between T pandemic vs. T baseline . Results Fewer paediatric MRI brains were performed during T pandemic compared to T baseline (12.2 vs 14.7 examinations/day). No significant difference was found between the two time periods regarding sex and age (T baseline : 557 females (44.63%), 7.95 ± 5.49 years, T pandemic : 385 females (44.61%), 7.64 ± 6.11 years; p = 1 and p = .079, respectively). MRI brain examinations during T pandemic had a higher likelihood of being abnormal, 41.25% vs. 25.32% ( p<.0001). Vascular abnormalities were more frequent during T pandemic (11.01% vs 8.01%, p = .02), congenital malformations were less common (8.34% vs 12.34%, p = .004). Severity of MRI brain examinations was significantly different when comparing group 4 and group 5 individually and combined between T baseline and T pandemic ( p = .0018, p < .0001, and p <.0001, respectively). Conclusions The rate of abnormality and severity found on paediatric brain MRI was significantly higher during the early phase of the pandemic, likely due to underutilisation.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1177/19714009231193161
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.