MARATTO

article · Dental Science Updates /Dental Science Updates

In-Vitro Investigation of the Microstructure, Elemental Analysis and Microhardness of Three Hybrid Resin Materials Used as Single-tooth restorations

2025Open accessSuez University

Abstract

Introduction: Technology constantly evolves, leading to the extensive usage ofCAD/CAM techniques (subtractive and additive manufacturing) to produce indirectrestorations. Nowadays, hybrid resin materials are commonly used to fabricate singletooth permanent restorations. Aim of the study: The current study evaluated andcompared three commercially available hybrid resin materials used for additive andsubtractive manufacturing of single-tooth permanent restorations. Methodology: 75bar-shaped specimens (14 x 2 x 2 mm) of 3 different hybrid resin materials were used inthis study and classified into 3 main groups. Lava Ultimate group (n=15), Vita Enamicgroup (n=15), and Flexcera Smile Ultra+ group (n=45). Flexcera Smile Ultra+ group wasfurther subdivided into 3 subgroups (n=15): Flexcera Smile Ultra+ A (0-degree printingangle), Flexcera Smile Ultra+ B (45-degree printing angle), and Flexcera Smile Ultra+C (90-degree printing angle). Specimens were investigated regarding microstructure,elemental analysis, and surface microhardness. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallistests were used for statistical data analysis. Results: Scanning electron microscopicimages showed typical hybrid resin materials with irregularly shaped fillers and differentsizes embedded in the resin matrix. Flexcera Smile Ultra+ specimens showed the higheststatistically significant carbon median value (42.65 wt.%). Lava Ultimate specimensshowed the highest statistically significant silicon and zirconium median values (27.15and 16.38 wt.%, respectively). Vita Enamic specimens showed the highest statisticallysignificant aluminum median value (9.15 wt.%) and surface microhardness mean value(205.02). Conclusions: The 3D printed material had higher resin content, lower fillercontent, and lower surface microhardness than CAD/CAM blocks. Specimens printedwith a 45-degree angle showed the best microhardness results.

Research topics

  • Dental materials and restorations
  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Advanced materials and composites

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2025.385544.1303

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.