MARATTO

article · Pathogens

In Vitro Evaluation of Colistin–Meropenem Activity Against XDR and PDR Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) pose significant therapeutic challenges due to their high resistance and global spread. Combination therapy with colistin (COL) and meropenem (MEM) was used to enhance antimicrobial activity. This study evaluated the COL-MEM combination against CRKP and CRAB isolates with a high resistance profile. A total of 58 carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates (31 CRKP and 27 CRAB), including extensively resistant and pandrug-resistant strains, were collected over a period of 12 months. Synergy between COL and MEM was assessed by microdilution checkerboard (MCB) and time-kill (TKA) assays. Carbapenemase genes were detected using molecular methods. The results showed that the COL-MEM combination yielded synergy (35.5% and 40.7%, respectively) and additive effects (35.5% and 37.0%, respectively), while no antagonism was observed. TKA confirmed bactericidal activity, especially at doubled MCB-detected concentrations, indicating dose-dependent activity. The significant reduction in the minimum inhibitory concentration in the combination indicated its potential for dose optimization, minimizing COL-associated toxicities. Genotypic profiling showed that the expression of blaNDM and blaOxa-48 can reduce synergy. These findings, obtained with isolates of high resistance, support the efficacy of this combination therapy and could reduce the dose-related side effects of COL. However, they also highlight genotype-specific variations and COL resistance mechanisms as limiting variables.

Research topics

  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/pathogens15020214

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.