article · Odontology
This study aimed to compare the marginal fit of the hybrid ceramic Vita Enamic (VE) crown fabricated with CAD/CAM versus prefabricated zirconia crown (PZC). An in vitro study was conducted on fifty epoxy resin replicas of 25 standardly prepared mandibular second primary molars (2 replicas for each tooth) were obtained. One tooth was restored with CAD/CAM VE (Zahnfabrik, H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG) after an optical impression acquired using CEREC Omnicam and the other tooth restored with PZC (NuSmile, Houston, TX, USA). Specimens were sectioned buccolingually and mesiodistally. The marginal fit average was measured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The difference was tested for statistical significance using an independent t test at a 5% significance level and 95% CI. CAD/CAM VE crowns showed superior marginal adaptation over the PZCs with a significant difference. The mean difference at the buccolingual section was -10.52 µm with a 95% CI of -20.99; -0.05 (P = 0.049). At the mesiodistal section, the mean difference was -10.56 µm with a 95% CI of -20.82; -0.30 (P = 0.044).VE provides a superior marginal fit over the PZC in the restoration of primary molars.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s10266-025-01089-2
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.