MARATTO

article · Journal of Medicinal Plants for Economic Development

In vitro antihelminthic studies on the leaves, stem and root barks of Cassia alata

2026Open accessUniversity of Ghana

Abstract

Background: The use of synthetic antihelminthic agents is often associated with adverse side effects and increasing drug resistance. These challenges have intensified the search for safer and more effective plant-based bioactive agents. Aim: To evaluate and compare the in vitro antihelminthic efficacy of the leaves, stem and root barks of Cassia alata. Setting: This study was designed to validate the folkloric application of C. alata as an antihelminthic agent. Methods: Crude ethanol extracts of the plants’ leaves, stem and root barks were prepared and subjected to phytochemical screening. Extract concentrations (25 mg/mL, 50 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL) were tested in vitro against Pheretima posthuma by measuring paralysis and death times. Mebendazole (MBZ) (15 mg/mL) served as the reference drug. Results: Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of tannins, alkaloids, saponins and flavonoids. The root bark showed the lowest activity overall; however, at 50 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL, it produced significantly (p < 0.05) shorter paralysis times (23.02 ± 1.61 min and 14.00 ± 2.61 min, respectively) than MBZ (32.00 ± 0.82 min). Only the 100 mg/mL root extract achieved a significantly (p < 0.05) shorter death time (57.67 ± 1.71 min) compared to MBZ (110.33 ± 1.70 min). In contrast, the leaf and stem bark extracts outperformed MBZ, producing significantly (p < 0.05) shorter paralysis and death times at all tested concentrations. Conclusion: Cassia alata exhibits notable antihelminthic activity. Contribution: The study highlights Cassia alata as a promising plant-based treatment for helminth infections.

Research topics

  • Helminth infection and control
  • Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4102/jomped.v10i1.325

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.