MARATTO

article · Education Sciences

Improving Mathematics Performance Through After-School Interventions: A Gender-Based Analysis of Low-Achieving Students

Abstract

Despite growing global interest in improving mathematics outcomes, there has been limited empirical research in Nigeria that has rigorously evaluated the impact of structured after-school intervention programs on low-achieving students, particularly through a gender-based lens. This study addresses this gap by examining the effectiveness of after-school mathematics instruction on the performance of senior secondary school students in Oyo State, Nigeria. The researchers adopted a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design with a 2 × 2 factorial structure. The sample consisted of 92 purposively selected low-achieving students (47 males and 45 females) from eight public, co-educational secondary schools, who were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Over the course of six weeks, the experimental group received structured after-school mathematics lessons that targeted foundational skills, while the control group continued with conventional classroom instruction. Data was collected using a researcher-developed Mathematics Achievement Test (MAT), which was validated by mathematics education experts and yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.82. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) revealed a statistically significant improvement in the mathematics achievement of students in the intervention group (F(1, 87) = 114.88, p < 0.05), with a large effect size (Partial η2 = 0.569). Although no significant interaction effect between gender and treatment was observed (F(1, 87) = 0.208, p > 0.05). This study contributes to the limited literature on gender-responsive after-school interventions in sub-Saharan African contexts. Findings support the implementation of targeted support programs to enhance mathematics outcomes for struggling learners, regardless of gender.

Research topics

  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/educsci15121587

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.