MARATTO

article · Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education

Improving Attitudes Towards Calculus through Inquiry-Driven Collaborative Learning Model + ChatGPT among Preservice Mathematics Teachers: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of Inquiry-Driven Collaborative Learning enriched with ChatGPT (IDCL+ChatGPT) on pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward calculus in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Anchored on Social Cognitive Theory, the study adopted a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The population comprised 1,122 NCE II Mathematics students in public NCE-awarding institutions in Kaduna State, from which 133 students were selected. Participants were assigned to IDCL+ChatGPT (n = 53), IDCL-only (n = 45), and conventional teaching (n = 35) groups. Data were collected using the Calculus Attitude Questionnaire (CAQ), validated by experts, with a reliability coefficient of 0.811. Descriptive statistics addressed the research questions, while ANCOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests tested hypotheses at the 0.05 significance level. Results revealed a significant group effect on posttest attitude scores, F(2,129) = 27.630, p < .001, partial η² = .300. Bonferroni comparisons showed that IDCL+ChatGPT significantly outperformed conventional teaching (p < .001), while IDCL-only also significantly outperformed conventional teaching (p < .001). However, the difference between IDCL+ChatGPT and IDCL-only was not significant (p = .071). The study concludes that IDCL effectively fosters positive attitudes toward calculus, while ChatGPT provides additional instructional support that enriches students’ learning experiences and supports meaningful classroom interaction and engagement

Research topics

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • E-Learning and COVID-19
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.67203/jossme.2026.jlw826lp

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.