MARATTO

article

Improved SINR m-Coverage Probability in 6G Networks: Unveiling the Sample Point Saturation Phenomenon in Urban and Suburban Environments

Abstract

This study looks at the influence of sample points on SINR-based m-coverage probability in Urban and Suburban environments within the context of 6G networks. SINR is a crucial factor impacting network coverage and reliability. While it is commonly assumed that increasing sample points enhances SINR coverage probability, the relationship between sample points and coverage probability remains intricate and not well-understood. The main objective of this study was to determine the saturation point at which additional sample points only marginally improve network performance. To achieve this, advanced simulations were conducted using the Poisson point process to spatially distribute nodes in single-tier and multi-tier networking scenarios. Existing mathematical models of path-loss, interference, and coverage probability were extended, taking into account other wireless phenomena present in urban and suburban environments. The analysis indicates a positive correlation between coverage probability and increasing sample points, as expected for improved network performance. However, intriguingly, both Urban and Suburban environments exhibit a saturation point, challenging the conventional belief of continuous improvements with more sample points. The optimization of sample point numbers becomes crucial to strike the right balance between accuracy and computational efficiency in designing 6G networks. These findings offer valuable insights for network planning, ultimately enhancing the overall performance and reliability of 6G networks in dynamic environments.

Research topics

  • Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1109/seb4sdg60871.2024.10629735

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.