article
This research investigates the design and performance of non-invasive blood glucose sensors using microwave resonators with two different permittivity substrates, Rogers 4360 G 2 (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\varepsilon=6.15$</tex>) and Rogers 4003C (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\varepsilon=3.38$</tex>). Numerical simulations conducted with the CST Microwave Studio electromagnetic solver were used to analyze the sensors' sensitivity and losses. The results demonstrated that the sensor with higher permittivity (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\varepsilon=6.15$</tex>) exhibited greater sensitivity (1.1 dB per mg/dL) and lower losses (0.55) compared to the sensor with lower permittivity (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\varepsilon=3.38$</tex>), which showed a sensitivity of 0.08 dB per mg/dL and losses of 0.68. These findings suggest that the sensor with higher permittivity is more effective for continuous glucose monitoring due to its superior sensitivity and efficiency.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/mwscas60917.2024.11113408
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.