MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Medicine

Impact of whole-body vibration on anthropometric measurements and body composition in overweight and obese university students: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of overweight and obesity among university students is a significant public health concern. Consequently, identifying safe exercise modalities for this population is a priority. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of whole-body vibration (WBV) in university students classified as overweight or obese, focusing on anthropometric measurements and body composition. Materials and methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted with a sample of 30 university students (both male and female) aged 18-25 years. Participants were allocated into two groups: the intervention group (WBV group), which received whole-body vibration (WBV) therapy together with selected exercises, and the control group (Sham WBV group), which received sham WBV alongside the same exercises, administered thrice per week over a six-week period. The primary outcome measures included body mass index (BMI), assessed using a stadiometer and digital scale, and waist circumference (WC), measured using a tape measure. Secondary outcomes were evaluated using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) via a smart scale to determine the whole-body fat percentage (BF%), visceral fat, and lean mass (kg). Results: = 0.884, 0.29, and 0.199, respectively). These findings suggest that WBV may preferentially affect central fat distribution rather than overall body composition. Conclusion: WBV positively impacted the anthropometric measurements of overweight and obese university students, as observed by improvements in BMI and WC. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT06913231.

Research topics

  • Effects of Vibration on Health
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Occupational Health and Performance

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1814883

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.