MARATTO

article · LIFE International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences

IMPACT OF THE LS-FACTOR ESTIMATION METHODS ON MEAN ANNUAL SOIL LOSS

20241 citationOpen accessUniversity of Nigeria

Abstract

Soil erosion was assessed in Anambra State using three different LS factor estimation methods. It showed that soil loss from the LS factor based on the slope in percent gives a good result with little underestimation with a PBIAS of -9.04 % while that based on slopes in radians performed best with a slight overestimation with a PBIAS of 2.81 %. The one based on degrees’ slope performed the least with a high underestimation with a PBIAS of -46.43 %. The result from field measurement yielded 27.76 t ha-1yr-1. The coefficient of variations was 241.47 %, 192.01 %, and 157.97 %, respectively, for slope in percent, radians and degree. Soil erosion is a highly variable phenomenon which was reflected by the high coefficient of variations. It shows that modelling soil erosion in the State with the LS factor estimation based on slopes in radians and percent yields better results. We believe this finding will be useful to authorities and scientists interested in soil erosion studies in the State. It is recommended that a similar study be extended to other terrains with moderate slopes.

Research topics

  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.20319/lijhls.2024.9.5161

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.