article · Journal of Clinical Medicine
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular aspiration is a central procedure in in vitro fertilisation (IVF), aiming to collect oocytes necessary for the success of assisted reproduction treatments. Follicular flushing, proposed in the absence of cumulo-oocyte complex (COC) at initial aspiration, remains controversial regarding its real impact on oocyte quality and pregnancy rates. <b>Methods</b>: In this controlled study, conducted in 274 patients, we evaluated the effects of systematic follicular flushing up to 10 washes with a standardised medium (pH 7.3 ± 0.1; 37.2 ± 0.2 °C) on oocyte yield, oocyte morphology, embryo kinetics and clinical outcomes. <b>Results</b>: Flushing resulted in an additional 38% recovery of COCs, mostly between the second and fifth flush, with no significant increase in oocyte dysmorphisms or major embryonic abnormalities. A slight increase in slow cleavages was observed (27% vs. 23%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), as well as a lower oocyte maturation rate when ovulation was triggered by Ovitrelle alone. Clinically, pregnancy rates per transfer were comparable between groups (33.27% without flushing vs. 32.86% with flushing; <i>p</i> = 0.67), as were miscarriage rates (9.11% vs. 8.69%; <i>p</i> = 0.81). <b>Conclusions</b>: These results indicate that follicular flushing, when applied according to a standardised protocol, significantly increases oocyte yield without compromising oocyte morphological quality or embryonic development potential. Although the observed clinical benefits remain modest, this approach could constitute a relevant complementary strategy, particularly in patients with poor ovarian response or in the context of poor initial recovery. However, the controlled but non-randomised nature of this study requires cautious interpretation of the findings. Larger randomised trials, integrating dynamic assessment technologies, such as time-lapse imaging or oocyte transcriptomic analysis, are needed to refine the clinical indications of this technique and explore its underlying biological mechanisms.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/jcm14217457
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.