MARATTO

article · British Journal of Radiology

Impact of PSMA PET/CT on initial staging and planning of definitive radiation therapy in prostate cancer

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: comparing risk grouping, target delineation, and dosimetric parameters between RT plans based on conventional imaging (CT and/or MRI pelvis with bone scan) versus 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the same patients. METHODS: A 75 newly diagnosed PCa patients treated with definitive RT between January 2019 and December 2022 at our center were included. Each underwent standard imaging and 18F-PSMA PET/CT. Two RT plans were generated; one from conventional imaging and another from PSMA PET/CT data using IMRT or RapidArc on the Eclipse (Varian, USA) system. Plans were compared regarding target volumes (TVs), dose-volume histograms (DVH), and doses to organs at risk (OARs). RESULTS: Mean age was 69.6 ± 8.1 years, and mean pretreatment PSA was 33.47 ± 42.05 ng/mL. Gleason score (GS) was 7 in 50.7% and 8-10 in 26.6%. PSMA -PET/CT altered TVs in 26 patients (34.7%). PSMA-based RT plans showed significantly higher rectal V60% (19.96% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.024), femoral maximum dose (46.37 Gy vs. 41.98 Gy, p = 0.006), and bowel maximum dose (54.7 Gy vs. 46.3 Gy, p = 0.014). Upstaged patients had larger mean prostate volumes (77.53 ± 34.76 cc vs. 59.76 ± 30.6 cc; p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: 18F-PSMA -PET/CT significantly impacts staging and RT planning in prostate cancer, leading to altered TVs and dosimetry, significantly in patients with larger prostates, but non significantly in patients with GS ≥ 8, and higher PSA levels. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: PSMA PET/CT meaningfully changes staging, TVs, and dosimetry. It highlights the modality's value in improving accuracy in definitive RT planning.

Research topics

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqag057

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.