MARATTO

article · Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy

Impact of neurophysiological respiratory facilitation techniques on arterial blood gas parameters in pediatric patients with bronchial pneumonia

Abstract

Bronchial pneumonia remains a significant cause of morbidity, particularly in pediatric populations. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of neurophysiological respiratory facilitation techniques on arterial blood gas parameters in pediatric patients with bronchial pneumonia. Sixty pediatric patients (ages 1–4 years) with bronchial pneumonia were randomly assigned to two groups. The control group (n = 30) received conventional chest physiotherapy, while the experimental group (n = 30) received additional neurophysiological facilitation techniques, including peri-oral pressure, intercostal stretch, anterior stretch-lifting, and abdominal co-contraction. Treatment was administered twice daily for a period of seven days. Arterial blood gases (PaO₂ and PaCO₂) were measured before and after treatment. The experimental group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in arterial blood gas parameters compared to the control group. Post-treatment PaO₂ increased more substantially in the experimental group (33.76 ± 11.59 to 77.36 ± 12.34 mmHg) than in controls (35.32 ± 12.16 to 62.33 ± 18.00 mmHg; p = 0.001). Similarly, PaCO₂ decreased more markedly in the experimental group (53.29 ± 9.41 to 38.36 ± 3.75 mmHg) versus controls (51.57 ± 11.59 to 41.68 ± 4.95 mmHg; p = 0.005). Neurophysiological respiratory facilitation techniques, when combined with conventional chest physiotherapy, significantly improve arterial blood gas parameters in pediatric patients with bronchial pneumonia.

Research topics

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s43161-026-00350-1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.