MARATTO

article · Discover Electronics

Impact of ionospheric delay on GNSS in a low-latitude region: a case study of Ogbomoso, Nigeria

Abstract

Accurate positioning and timing services are critically dependent on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS); however, their performance is often degraded by ionospheric delay. This study evaluates the impact of ionospheric delay on GNSS positioning accuracy over Ogbomoso, Nigeria (≈ 8.1° N, 4.2° E), using one year of GNSS observations data recorded at 4 Hz with a u-blox ZED-F9P receiver. The data were converted to RINEX format using the RTKLIB suite and subsequently processed with the GPS-GOPI software to compute the Total Electron Content (TEC) and related parameters required for estimating the ionospheric delay. The positioning accuracy was then assessed using the Single Point Positioning (SPP) technique, evaluated through key statistical performance metrics including the Two-Distance Root Mean Square (2DRMS), Circular Error Probable (CEP), Spherical Error Probable (SEP), and Mean Radial Spherical Error (MRSE) indices. The results revealed the TEC, ionospheric delay, and geomagnetic disturbances coupling effect on SPP. It also showed that ionospheric delay exhibited seasonal modulation, with higher magnitudes during the dry season (mean = 2.54 m) compared with the rainy season (mean = 2.39 m). Daily mean ionospheric delays ranged from 0.10 m to 3.70 m, while positioning accuracy metrics varied accordingly (2DRMS = 3.95–6.91 m; CEP = 1.64–2.89 m; SEP = 3.49–5.48 m; MRSE = 4.47–7.41 m). Moderate positive correlations (r = 0.29–0.36) between ionospheric delay and these accuracy indices confirmed that delay fluctuations degrade positioning precision. The findings demonstrate that ionospheric delay remains an important source of error for GNSS users in equatorial regions.

Research topics

  • GNSS positioning and interference
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Advanced Frequency and Time Standards

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s44291-026-00185-z

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.