MARATTO

article · The Egyptian Journal of Surgery

Impact of gastric pouch volume on postoperative weight loss outcomes: A three years follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Abstract

Background: Weight loss failure following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a main cause of surgical revision,deteriorating patients’ quality of life and causing the resurgence of comorbidities. Weight loss after LSG has a multifactorial mechanism. The residual gastric volume (RGV) seems to have a crucial role. Our study aimed to measure the RGV after LSG and its correlation with postoperative weight loss outcomes.Patients and Methods: The present study was a prospective cohort study conducted on 56 obese patients who underwent LSG. The RGV was measured by multidetector computed tomography at 1-, 12-, and 36-months following surgery and was correlated with weight loss outcomes.Results: LSG achieves sufficient and durable weight loss as well as comorbidity resolution. There was a statisticallysignificant decrease in mean body mass index (BMI) from 50.66 kg/m2 preoperatively to 32.94 kg/m2 3 years afterintervention. The percentage of excess weight loss (% EWL) significantly increased from 16.44% at 1 month to 64.1%at 3 years postoperatively. Also, there was a statistically significant increase in mean RGV from 100.23±18.11 at 1month after surgery to 174.88±18.9 at 1 year which also increased to 292.0±38.26 at 3 years postoperatively. We found anonsignificant correlation between weight loss outcomes and the increased RGV.Conclusion: Dilatation of sleeve pouch appears to be a physiological process, and no correlation was found between thisdilation and postoperative weight loss outcomes after 3 years of LSG. Long-term studies are required to authorize thisresult.

Research topics

  • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/ejsur.2024.284820.1055

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.