MARATTO

article · Physics of the Solid State

Impact of AlN Buffer Layer Thickness on Electronic and Electrical Characteristics of In0.17Al0.83N/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistor

Abstract

In this paper, we delved into the intricacies of In0.17Al0.83N/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs) using a comprehensive simulation model and by Leveraging the capabilities of Nextnano simulation software. We extensively explored how different thicknesses of the AlN buffer layer impact electronic and electrical properties. Our study was centered on scrutinizing the density and mobility of the two-dimensional electron gas (2-DEG) within the In0.17Al0.83N/GaN HEMT structure. Aiming to understand how different AlN buffer layer thicknesses impact device performance. Our findings unveil a crucial relationship between AlN buffer layer thickness and critical performance metrics. Specifically, we observed significant trends in output current and transconductance, shedding light on the direct influence of AlN thickness on device behavior. Our simulations identified an optimal AlN thickness of 350 nm, demonstrating the highest output current and surpassing a transconductance peak of 510 mS/mm. Importantly, our computational predictions closely align with experimental observations, validating the reliability and accuracy of our simulation model. Through this meticulous analysis, we contribute valuable insights that can guide the design and optimization of In0.17Al0.83N/GaN HEMT, paving the way for improved device performance and functionality across various electronic applications. Our study underscores the importance of considering AlN buffer layer thickness in designing and engineering high-performance HEMTs, highlighting avenues for future research and development in semiconductor device technology.

Research topics

  • GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
  • Ga2O3 and related materials
  • ZnO doping and properties

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1134/s1063783424600766

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.