MARATTO

article · Scientific Journal of King Faisal University Basic and Applied Sciences

Immunohistochemical expression of Stem Cell Marker, Sex-Determining Region Y-Box2 (SOX2) in Endometrial Carcinoma

Abstract

Sex-determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2), a member of the SOX family, plays a critical role in the regulation of cancerous stem cells. SOX2 can affect embryonic stem cells' capacity for self-renewal and pluripotency. The aim of this study is to assess SOX2 expression and correlation of this expression with different pathological variables in endometrial carcinoma. For 85 endometrial cancer cases that underwent total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, immunohistochemical staining for SOX2 was done. In tumor cells, SOX-2 expression was evaluated. SOX2 expression was detected in 18% of cases, of which undifferentiated and serous endometrial carcinoma showed the highest expression and showed statistically significant relation with high grade, high FIGO stage, high pathological (T) stage, cervical, adnexal and/or serosal, parametrial and/or vaginal involvement, nodal metastasis, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), omental tumor deposits and advanced metastatic risk tumor, according to ESGO-ESTRO-ESP system for risk stratification (P value 0.045, 0.011, 0.024, 0.012, 0.004, 0.003, 0.013, 0.032, 0.031 and 0.021), respectively. SOX2 expression was related to high-risk endometrial carcinomas with poor clinicopathological parameters. Thus, SOX2 may be considered as a potential marker for poor prognosis and could be useful in identifying cases that require closer follow-up and aggressive treatment. KEYWORDS Tumor grade, tumor stage, oncogenic marker, stem cells, tumor progression, tumor risk

Research topics

  • Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.37575/b/med/250032

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.