article · Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research
Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the Ilioinguinal approach and the modified Stoppa approach regarding clinical and radiological outcomes. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study involved 30 patients who were split into two groups. Results: There was no significant difference regarding the clinical and radiological outcomes and residual medial wall displacement. Blood loss during the operation was less in the modified Stoppa approach. Conclusion: When treating anterior column fractures, the modified Stoppa approach reduces blood loss and expedites surgery compared to the Ilioinguinal approach. The study’s original hypothesis has been validated, indicating that the modified Stoppa approach is a superior alternative for managing these fractures.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.25259/jmsr_225_2024
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.