MARATTO

article · Algorithms

Hybrid Deep Learning Methods for Human Activity Recognition and Localization in Outdoor Environments

20251 citationOpen accessJigjiga University

Abstract

Activity recognition and localization in outdoor environments involve identifying and tracking human movements using sensor data, computer vision, or deep learning techniques. This process is crucial for applications such as smart surveillance, autonomous systems, healthcare monitoring, and human–computer interaction. However, several challenges arise in outdoor settings, including varying lighting conditions, occlusions caused by obstacles, environmental noise, and the complexity of differentiating between similar activities. This study presents a hybrid deep learning approach that integrates human activity recognition and localization in outdoor environments using Wi-Fi signal data. The study focuses on applying the hybrid long short-term memory–bi-gated recurrent unit (LSTM-BIGRU) architecture, designed to enhance the accuracy of activity recognition and location estimation. Moreover, experiments were conducted using a real-world dataset collected with the PicoScene Wi-Fi sensing device, which captures both magnitude and phase information. The results demonstrated a significant improvement in accuracy for both activity recognition and localization tasks. To mitigate data scarcity, this study utilized the conditional tabular generative adversarial network (CTGAN) to generate synthetic channel state information (CSI) data. Additionally, carrier frequency offset (CFO) and cyclic shift delay (CSD) preprocessing techniques were implemented to mitigate phase fluctuations. The experiments were conducted in a line-of-sight (LoS) outdoor environment, where CSI data were collected using the PicoScene Wi-Fi sensor platform across four different activities at outdoor locations. Finally, a comparative analysis of the experimental results highlights the superior performance of the proposed hybrid LSTM-BIGRU model, achieving 99.81% and 98.93% accuracy for activity recognition and location prediction, respectively.

Research topics

  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/a18040235

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.