MARATTO

article · International Journal of Forensic Sciences

How to Investigate Legal and Professional Liability in Cosmetic Intervention Issues

20241 citationOpen accessSuez University

Abstract

In recent years, cosmetic interventions have been growing rapidly in the world for beauty and luxury. Cosmetic interventions are classified into two types. The first type is surgical or invasive cosmetic intervention type which has a high risk such as liposuction and rhinoplasty while the second type is non-surgical, reversible, minimally invasive cosmetic interventions with low risk such as Botox and fillers. The surgical type of cosmetic intervention may be reconstructive type due to acceptable medical reasons such as repair of congenital defects or aesthetic type for beauty only. In recent years, a lot of claims have arisen against cosmetic intervention professionals because of improper performance of cosmetic interventions, medical negligence, or complications such as deformity and facial disfigurement. Therefore, this article aims to show professional standards of cosmetic interventions that should be applied and discuss rules that govern the legal and professional liability of physicians while performing these cosmetic interventions.

Research topics

  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Digital Imaging in Medicine

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.23880/ijfsc-16000378

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.