article · Journal of Business Analytics
The proliferation of chatbot development tools presents a significant challenge in identifying the most suitable ones for specific needs. This study addresses this issue by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to create a comprehensive methodology for selecting chatbot development tools. The study aims to provide a transparent, objective decision-making framework by evaluating tools across multiple dimensions including deployment characteristics, input processing capabilities, dialogue management, response generation, and economic considerations. Utilizing AHP for criteria weighting and TOPSIS for ranking alternatives, the methodology systematically evaluates various tools to identify the optimal choice. Key findings highlight the strengths and weaknesses of different tools, offering insights that guide developers and organizations in choosing the most suitable chatbot development tool aligned with their specific needs and strategic goals. The implications of this methodology are significant, enhancing decision-making processes within technological tool selection and contributing to the fields of artificial intelligence and automated systems development.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/2573234x.2024.2399087
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.