MARATTO

article · Open Forum Infectious Diseases

High-altitude <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> and <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> reservoirs in Ethiopia are not linked to recent travel

2026Open accessGondar University

Abstract

Abstract Background The Ethiopian highlands &amp;gt;2000 meters above sea level are classified as experiencing very low malaria transmission, but clinical case numbers increased in recent years. Transmission intensity, and how many infections are imported from the lowlands, are not known. Methods Surveys on subclinical prevalence were conducted in eight sites across an altitude range of &amp;lt;1900 to 2900 m. Samples were screened by qPCR, and microscopy or RDT. Data on recent travel was collected from subclinical and clinical individuals. Result Among 1241 subclinical individuals P. falciparum prevalence by qPCR decreased from 67% at 1850 m to 16% at 2850 m. P. vivax prevalence ranged from 10% to 34%, with no clear altitude trend. 20.3% of individuals reported recent travel, which did not affect risk of infection. Among 1775 microscopy-positive clinical patients in eight health centers, recent travel was reported by 2-16% of patients at altitudes &amp;lt;2500 m, 21% in a health center at 2600 m, and 100% at 2830 m. P. falciparum RDT diagnosis based on LDH detected nearly twice as many subclinical infections than diagnosis based on HRP2. Conclusions High prevalence at altitudes up to 2800 m, and a minority of individuals reporting recent travel might indicate sustained local transmission in the Ethiopian highlands, though undocumented travel and P. vivax relapses limit the ability to accurately estimate the proportion infections being imported. Sites up to 2500 m should be considered endemic for malaria, and control interventions need to be intensified.

Research topics

  • Malaria Research and Control
  • Travel-related health issues
  • Vector-borne infectious diseases

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofag247

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.