MARATTO

article · Journal of Nursing Science Benha University/Journal of Nursing Science Benha University

Heart Failure Versus Renal Failure Patients in Relation to Outcomes of Alternate Nostril Breathing: Comparative Study.

2024Open accessBenha University

Abstract

Background: Heart failure and renal failure patients have limited physical activity and decreased quality of life. Alternate-nostril breathing is a breathing that reduces bad progression to their disease by regular practicing. Aim: Was to evaluate the effect of alternate nostril breathing exercise on heart failure and renal failure patients' outcomes. Design: Quasi-experimental comparative design was utilized to achieve the aim of this study. Setting: The study was conducted in cardiac care unit and hemodialysis unit at Benha University Hospital. Sample: Purposive sample (70 heart failure patients &70 renal failure patients) was included in this study. Tools: Four tools were used, tool I: Patients' interview questionnaire, tool II: Physiologic parameters assessment, tool III: Sleep quality scale and tool IV: Fatigue assessment scale. Results: There were highly statistical significant differences in patients' outcomes between pre ANB intervention as compared to after 1 month and 3 months intervention among heart failure and renal failure patients as (p≤0.001) which were presented by physiologic parameters, sleep quality and fatigue level. Conclusion: Alternate nostril breathing exercise has been shown significantly improvement of outcomes among heart failure & renal failure patients while renal failure patients' outcomes have been shown higher improvement. Recommendations: Hospitals are recommended to implement the alternate-nostril breathing exercise alongside other treatments to improve heart failure & renal failure patients' outcomes as well as, for other patients with chronic illness.

Research topics

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/jnsbu.2024.344555

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.