MARATTO

article · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Health Risk Assessment of Nail Technicians in the Formal and Informal Sectors of Johannesburg, South Africa

20252 citationsOpen accessUniversity of the Witwatersrand

Abstract

Exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in nail salons poses risks of acute and chronic health effects for nail technicians. The objectives of this study were to investigate differences in VOC exposure and self-reported symptoms among formal and informal nail technicians and assess the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks using a probabilistic approach. A questionnaire was administered to 54 formal and 60 informal nail technicians to elicit information on sociodemographic characteristics, work conditions, and self-reported symptoms. Passive sampling was employed to measure 60 personal breathing zone concentrations of VOCs among 20 nail technicians (both formal and informal) over three consecutive days, along with 29 passive samples for formaldehyde in the informal sector. All VOC concentrations, except formaldehyde, were below occupational exposure limits. Sixty percent of the informal nail technicians and fifty-two percent of the formal nail technicians reported health-related symptoms; however, the difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The median and 95th percentile non-cancer risks exceeded the hazard coefficient for 2-propanol in all technicians and MMA among informal technicians. The benzene and formaldehyde cancer risk estimates (medians and 95th percentiles) exceeded the US Environmental Protection Agency cancer risk threshold of 1 × 10<sup>-6</sup>. These findings indicate that nail technicians are at risk of developing acute and chronic health effects from long-term low-level exposure to VOCs.

Research topics

  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Occupational exposure and asthma

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22030330

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.