MARATTO

article · Annals of Hematology

Haemoglobin variants in nigeria: real-world data from a point-of-care device

20251 citationOpen accessUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan

Abstract

Low-middle-income countries (LMICs) have used cellulose acetate electrophoresis preferentially in the diagnosis of haemoglobinopathies. Recently, point-of-care (POC) devices have made the diagnosis faster and cheaper. This study analyzed results of haemoglobin variants obtained from 'Gazelle', a POC device. A retrospective data from a tertiary hospital over a two-year period. Hereditary persistence of fetal haemoglobin (HPFH) and beta thalassaemia trait were diagnosed using a cut off of HbF of ≥ 15% and HbA2 of ≥ 3% respectively, other haemoglobin variants were as reported by the instrument. Results were compared between women accessing antenatal care and those for premarital counselling ('controls') with in-patients. A total of 1104 samples were sent for analysis during the period, but 1093 were analyzed because 11 samples were indeterminate. The distribution of the genotypes of the control was different from that of the in-patients (P = 0.02), but was comparable to that of an infant population (P = 0.71). The prevalence of HPFH and BTT were 21% (229/1093) and 36% (391/1093) respectively. The prevalence of HPFH was highest among HbSS (47.8%) compared to HbAA (22%) or HbAS (10.4%); P < 0.001. The prevalence of BTT was highest among HbAA (55.1%) compared to HbAS (5.4%) and HbSS (1.1%); P < 0.001. The prevalence of HPFH did not differ between the in-patients and the controls 23.1% vs. 19.1% respectively (p = 0.33) but the prevalence of BTT was higher among the controls (36% vs. 38%; P = 0.001). The high prevalence of sickle cell anaemia, HPFH and BTT in the community may be interrelated.

Research topics

  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Blood donation and transfusion practices

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s00277-025-06650-1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.