MARATTO

article · The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences

GLOBAL PREVALENCE OF FELINE CORONAVIRUS INFECTION (FCOV) IN DOMESTIC CATS: SYSTEMATIC META-ANALYSIS

20231 citationOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic meta-analysis on global prevalence of Feline Coronavirus (FCoV) infection. According to the guidelines of PRISMA, the meta-analysis was performed. After compete search, data extraction and selection of studies, data were analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis software program. The results of meta-analysis were95% confidence intervals, effect size, heterogeneity, weight, and publication bias. In the finally selected studies (54 articles), the overall prevalence of FCoV was 32.42 %,wherein, a total of 13,639 cats out of 42,076 were found to be positive for FCoV. The prevalence of infection was most prevalent in Europe (47.6%), but less prevalent in North and M/ Central America (3.88%). The lowest infection rate was recorded in the USA, but the highest was recorded in Germany (0.6% vs 100%). Results of meta-analysis for fixed effect showeda Z value of -30.213 (p=0.00), but for random effect, the z value was -0.310 (P = 0.756). The degree of heterogeneity in the selected study on both fixed and random effect was measured and demonstrated by the forest plot (I-squared: 99.046; Q-value: 5453.144 and P value: 0.000. The output of the Egger regression test was intercept (1.82), confidence interval (-1.72- 5.37), t-value (1.03) and p-value (0.30). However, the result of Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test was Kendall’s Tau (0.00), z-value for Tau (0.00) and P value (0.5). In conclusion, the present results indicate that the FCoV infection is globally widespread.Therefore, strict prevention and control policies should be formulated. Keywords:Epidemiology, cat, Coronavirus, Prevalence, Meta-analysis.

Research topics

  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.36899/japs.2023.6.0689

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.