article · Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Purpose Growing concern over the mismatch between higher education outcomes and labour market needs has increased interest in degree apprenticeships as a work-integrated learning (WIL) model. This study comparatively analyses degree apprenticeship models in Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), Australia, the United States of America (USA) and India, focusing on their structure, governance, delivery, future-ready skills, employability outcomes and scalability. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative comparative case study approach was adopted using secondary data from national policy documents, government reports, institutional frameworks and peer-reviewed literature. The data were analysed through thematic content analysis guided by the study's research objectives. Findings The findings show that degree apprenticeships enhance graduate employability and workforce readiness across all five countries. The UK and Germany demonstrate well-coordinated national systems with strong employer engagement and institutional integration. Australia and the USA adopt more decentralised and employer-led approaches that encourage innovation but face fragmentation. India represents an emerging model supported by ambitious policy reforms but constrained by implementation challenges. Common barriers include policy fragmentation, uneven institutional adoption and limited public awareness. Research limitations/implications The study relies on secondary data and excludes detailed comparisons of occupational coverage and funding arrangements because comparable evidence across countries was limited. Practical implications The study recommends stronger university–employer collaboration, nationally coordinated policy frameworks, embedded work-based learning and greater employer participation in curriculum design and delivery. Social implications Degree apprenticeships have the potential to enhance social inclusion by widening access to higher education, particularly for underrepresented and disadvantaged groups. Originality/value By comparing degree apprenticeship models across five G20 countries, this study identifies transferable practices and policy lessons for developing scalable, inclusive and future-ready apprenticeship systems.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1108/heswbl-05-2025-0215
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.