article · Environmental Research Letters
Abstract Air pollution is a global health crisis, but evidence on public perceptions of pollution exposure and mitigation demands remains fragmented. We first map "what research covers" by reviewing the survey-based literature on public views of air pollution, coding 456 studies through a transparent, LLM-assisted screening and classification workflow. Then, we map "what surveys offer" by cataloging 112 air-quality survey items in cross-national survey programs, coding them manually using the same classification framework. We find persistent geographic and exposure-level biases: survey-based research focuses on high-income countries, China and India, while cross-national item coverage is more clustered in Europe. Thematically, both domains emphasize perceptions, with gaps in behavior, policy preferences, and health—particularly in high-exposure regions. These findings highlight that where mitigation is most needed, research coverage is most limited and accessible survey data most scarce. Methodologically, the paper develops a validated LLM-assisted workflow to facilitate future large-scale literature mapping and classification.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ae7132
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.