MARATTO

article · Acta agriculturae Slovenica

Genotypic variation in response to drought stress is associated with biochemical and transcriptional regulation of ureides metabolism in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Abstract

Ureidic legumes such as common bean (Phaseoulus valgaris L.) plants export nitrogen from the nodules to shoots and leaves as ureides during symbiotic biological nitrogen fixation. Common bean gene encoding allantoinase (allantoin amidohydrolase, EC 3.5.2.5), is a key enzyme that catalyses the hydrolysis of allantoin to allantoic acid. It plays a role in ureide generation for export and ureide catabolism to generate a nitrogen source in sinks tissues. As such, one of the adaptive mechanisms of plants to drought stress, is associated with ureides accumulation. To identify genetic variation of common bean in response to drought stress, changes in the expression of ALLANTONAISE (PvALN) gene and ureides content were examined in the leaf tissues of the three common bean genotypes (CAL96, DAB514 and DAB541) and one tepary bean genotype (Phaseolus acutifolius A.Gray). Amongst all the genotypes, the suggested drought susceptibility in DAB514 common bean genotype, was probably attributed to a repressed PvALN expression rate which were corroborated by an impaired ureides levels, and reduced plant growth. On contrary, drought stress induced an upregulated relative expression of PvALN coupled with an increase in allantoin and allantoate in DAB541 common bean genotype. In addition, the sustained plant growth in CAL96 was probably attributed to a steady amount of allantoin synthesized under drought stress. Taken together, DAB541 and CAL96 common bean genotypes are the promising genotypes with an induced upregulated transcriptional control of catabolism and/or biosynthesis of ureides, hence potential genotypes for selection and introduction under Botswana semi-arid conditions.

Research topics

  • Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.14720/aas.2022.118.2.2541

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.