review · Heliyon
The Twangiza-Namoya Gold Deposit within the Kibaran Belt of the Democratic Republic of the Congo represents a crucial manifestation of the hydrothermal gold system. This review investigates its intricate origin and the subsequent metallogenic evolution that has shaped its present-day characteristics and offers a systematic categorization based on its deposition processes and geotectonic settings. The findings reveal that the gold deposits are predominantly derived from sedimentary fluid sources. Within this vast metallogenic province, two stages of gold deposition have been constrained: (a) the early-stage formation related to the accretion of Rodinia assembly with subduction-collisional event where diagenesis cemented the syngenetic pyrite carbonaceous sediments and (b) the later stage deposition related to the continent-collisional event during the last stage of Rodinia supercontinent amalgamation. Previous isotopic investigations, with a particular emphasis on pyrite sulfur isotopes on both host rocks and vein-bearing sulfides, have been instrumental in tracing the origins of gold-bearing fluids in the study region. The isotopic variance in the four deposits: Twangiza (-5.2 % to +3 %, avg. -0.3 %), Kamituga (-0.6 % to -0.9.1 %, avg. -5%), Lugushwa (+3.0 % to -18.4 %), and Namoya, on the southernmost end, has a vast range but with much heavier isotope compositions, ranging between +1.3 % and to +22.6 %, with an average of +12.2 %. The data predominantly points to the sedimentary origins of ore fluids in the Twangiza-Namoya Gold belt, highlighting the pivotal role of sedimentary processes in shaping the metallogenic landscape of the region. The fluids inclusions depicted the deposits to be formed from H<sub>2</sub>O-Nacl-H<sub>2</sub>O with abundant CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> ore-forming fluid, moderate temperature (350-500 °C), and low salinity. The overall results confirm the genetic style of the Twangiza-Namoya Gold Belt to be an orogenic gold-style deposit that was emplaced during the early Neoproterozoic era in low greenschist facies terrain.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33222
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.