MARATTO

article · Discover Artificial Intelligence

Generative hybrid models for fraud detection in auto insurance with a comparative analysis of VAE, GAN, and diffusion approaches

2025Open accessMohamed I University

Abstract

Fraud claim detection in auto insurance remains a vital yet complex challenge, mainly due to imbalanced data sets, non-linear feature interactions, and the necessity for explicable predictions. While traditional Machine Learning (ML) approaches show promise, they frequently struggle from poor generalization, limited interpretability, and inadequate treatment of rare fraudulent cases. The present paper proposes a new hybrid approach involving generative models —namely Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and Diffusion Models (DMs)—with an ensemble of classifiers including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), and Light Gradient Boosting (Light GBM), coupled with Isolation Forest (IF) for anomaly detection and oversampling-based techniques (SMOTE and ADASYN) to ameliorate class balance. In total, 18 hybrid combinations were developed and evaluated across classification performance (AUC-ROC, Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score), probabilistic calibration (Brier Score and Log loss), and stochastic stability (Monte Carlo Variance and Bootstrap Variance). The experimental findings—backed up by graphical analysis based on radar plots, ROC curves, 3D metric visualization, and SHAP explainability—confirm that DM coupled with XGBoost and SMOTE (DM_XGBoost_SMOTE) and DM with Light GBM and SMOTE (DM_Light GBM_SMOTE) outperform alternative combinations. In particular, DM_XGBoost_SMOTE achieves a well balanced compromise between accuracy, confidence calibration, and robustness. This work underlines the efficiency of Diffusion-based hybrid models in fraud detection and opens the way for their implementation in high-risk, real-world insurance environments.

Research topics

  • Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s44163-025-00574-5

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.