MARATTO

article · Open MIND

Generative AI: The Key to the Future of Authorship and Academic Writings

Abstract

This article explores the transformative role of Generative AI in the domain of authorship and academic writings, focusing on its potential and challenges for the future of academic writing. The purpose of this study is to investigate how Gen AI affects writers' creative processes, productivity, and collaboration. The methodology employed in this research involves a comprehensive literature review, analyzing existing studies on Gen AI and its applications in authorship and academic writings. Various scholarly sources, including articles, books, and reports, are examined to provide a well-rounded overview of the topic. The findings reveal that Gen AI can serve as a valuable tool to inspire and support authors in their creative pursuits. Its capability to generate original content ignites fresh ideas, characters, and plotlines, ultimately overcoming creative blocks and enhancing overall productivity. Additionally, the study emphasizes the significance of collaborative authorship, highlighting the synergy between human ingenuity and AI-driven precision in crafting compelling narratives. The originality and value of this research lie in its insights into the potential of Gen AI for content curation, multilingual reach, and interactive storytelling experiences, thereby promising an enthralling era of literature. Ethical considerations are also discussed, underscoring the importance of preserving the authenticity of human expression while embracing AI-generated content. Ultimately, this study opens the door to untold literary exploration, revolutionizing the art of storytelling and academic writings in our ever-evolving technological landscape. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI, Authorship, Academic Writing

Research topics

  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18687801

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.