article · Review of Socio-Economic Research and Development Studies
Public participation is fundamental to good governance principle in South Africa, yet its implementation at the municipalities remains constrained by institutional capacity, technological, and socio-economic challenges. This study examined the perceived benefits of hybrid e-participation in enhancing citizen involvement in the Integrated Development Planning (IDP) process within the Greater Tzaneen Local Municipality (GTM). The increasing adoption of digital governance, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has created opportunities to strengthen transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in line with the Batho Pele principles. However, persistent digital inequalities, inadequate infrastructure, limited internet access, and low digital literacy continue to exclude many rural citizens from meaningful participation. A mixed-methods approach was employed, using questionnaire data collected from 312 community members and qualitative interviews with three municipal officials. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, regression analysis, and thematic content analysis. The findings reveal that although hybrid e-participation improves access to municipal information and services, its effectiveness in promoting meaningful citizen engagement remains limited, with participants expressing predominantly neutral perceptions. Education level and residential location significantly influenced participation, while inadequate infrastructure, weak institutional responsiveness, and one-way communication practices constrained effective engagement and diminished public trust. The study concludes that sustainable hybrid e-participation requires more than technological adoption and should be supported by robust legal and governance frameworks. It recommends expanding digital infrastructure, improving digital literacy, strengthening two-way feedback mechanisms, institutionalising hybrid participation models, and ensuring compliance with the Protection of Personal Information Act to promote inclusive, transparent, and accountable local governance.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22208589
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.