MARATTO

article · Science Advances

Four decades of data indicate that planted mangroves stored up to 75% of the carbon stocks found in intact mature stands

202448 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Dar es Salaam

In plain language

Planted mangroves can store substantial amounts of carbon, though they do not fully match the levels seen in naturally established mature forests. An analysis of data spanning 40 years across 684 planted stands worldwide reveals that biomass carbon stocks peak at 71 to 73 per cent of intact stand levels roughly 20 years after planting. Restoring sites with mixed species, specifically incorporating Rhizophora species, yields higher carbon accumulation in plant biomass than planting single species alone. In the soil, carbon stocks rise by 25 per cent during the initial five years post-planting before stabilising at roughly 75 per cent of the carbon found in intact soils. Consequently, planting mangroves halts continuing soil carbon loss caused by land use change, providing vital quantitative benchmarks to guide coastal restoration planning and carbon accounting.

Key takeaways

  • Planted mangrove biomass carbon stocks reach 71 to 73 per cent of intact forest levels about 20 years after planting.
  • Mixed-species plantings that include Rhizophora species accumulate more biomass carbon than single-species plantings.
  • Soil carbon increases by 25 per cent in the first five years after planting and then stabilises at 75 per cent of intact soil carbon stocks.
  • Planting mangroves successfully halts ongoing soil carbon losses resulting from land use change.

Why it matters

Mangrove restoration is widely promoted to combat climate change, yet realistic expectations for carbon capture have been uncertain. Demonstrating that planted stands recover roughly three quarters of intact carbon stocks over two decades provides conservation managers and policymakers with verifiable timelines. It also highlights that selecting mixed tree species enhances carbon storage while protecting vulnerable coastal soils from ongoing degradation.

Commercialisation angle

These findings provide empirical baselines for carbon offset verification, restoration planning, and coastal habitat management. Environmental project developers, carbon credit registries, and conservation bodies can directly apply these benchmarks to quantify expected carbon sequestration and design mixed-species planting programmes. Because the insights stem from 40 years of global field data, they represent applied, near-market evidence suitable for immediately guiding the development and financing of blue carbon projects.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Mangroves' ability to store carbon (C) has long been recognized, but little is known about whether planted mangroves can store C as efficiently as naturally established (i.e., intact) stands and in which time frame. Through Bayesian logistic models compiled from 40 years of data and built from 684 planted mangrove stands worldwide, we found that biomass C stock culminated at 71 to 73% to that of intact stands ~20 years after planting. Furthermore, prioritizing mixed-species planting including <i>Rhizophora</i> spp. would maximize C accumulation within the biomass compared to monospecific planting. Despite a 25% increase in the first 5 years following planting, no notable change was observed in the soil C stocks thereafter, which remains at a constant value of 75% to that of intact soil C stock, suggesting that planting effectively prevents further C losses due to land use change. These results have strong implications for mangrove restoration planning and serve as a baseline for future C buildup assessments.

Research topics

  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adk5430

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.