article · Pharmaceuticals
Background: Glioma remains an intractable and highly aggressive brain tumor, mainly due to the daunting obstacle presented by the blood–brain barrier (BBB). To overcome this challenge and enhance therapeutic efficacy, a dual-drug delivery system was engineered. This system co-encapsulated curcumin, a nutraceutical with multitargeted anticancer potential, with atorvastatin calcium, a repurposed anticancer agent, within lipidic nanocapsules (LNCs). Methods: LNCs were prepared via the phase inversion temperature method and optimized using a Box–Behnken design. The optimized LNCs were subsequently functionalized with folic acid (FA) to enable active targeting. FA-LNCs were characterized using XPS, TEM, in vitro release, and MTT cytotoxicity assays. Atorvastatin and curcumin were radiolabeled separately with iodine-131 to evaluate the in vivo pharmacokinetics in a glioma-bearing mouse model. Results: The optimized LNCs and FA-LNCs displayed a mean particle size of 97.98 ± 2.27 nm and 181.60 ± 2.83 nm, a polydispersity index of 0.32 ± 0.07 and 0.40 ± 0.02, and a zeta potential of −15.85 ± 1.35 mV and −11.90 ± 2.80, respectively. XPS and FTIR analyses verified FA conjugation. Both LNCs and FA-LNCs enhanced the in vitro cytotoxicity compared to free drugs; however, the most pronounced effect of FA functionalization was observed in vivo. Most significantly, FA-LNCs achieved markedly greater glioma accumulation than non-functionalized LNCs, with AUC values 2.0-fold higher for atorvastatin and 2.6-fold higher for curcumin. When compared to the free drug solutions, this efficiency was even more pronounced, with atorvastatin and curcumin showing enhancements of 8.2 and 12.4 times, respectively. Conclusions: FA-LNCs markedly improved glioma targeting efficiency and reduced systemic clearance, which underscores the therapeutic potential of integrating nutraceuticals with repurposed agents to achieve effective glioma therapy.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/ph18111623
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.