article · QJM
Abstract Background The burden of cervical radicular pain on patients and systems of health in different countries is an important medical issue that needs more significant medical researches to find a new solutions, treatment and limited interventional methods to improve patient's quality of life, prevent complications and decrease the cost on health systems. Objective To compare the effectiveness of cervical injection guided by either ultrasonography or fluoroscopy. Patients and Methods Sixty patients with lower cervical radiculopathy resistant to medical treatment were included in this study. Randomly, patients received cervical block ultrasonography guided or Fluoroscopic guided. Patients were followed up at 14 days and 90 days by Brief Pain Inventory Scale. Results In our study both groups showed significant decline in pain Inventory scale from baseline till 90 days after injection. Conclusion Both ways of injection guided by either ultrasonography or fluoroscopy showed the same effectiveness in relief of pain in lower cervical radiculopathy at 14 days and 90 days.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae070.344
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.