MARATTO

article · Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism

Fitness tests as predictors of physical exertion on graded hiking trails

Abstract

Lack of information regarding the level of fitness required to complete a hiking trail may create perceived and real health risks for inexperienced hikers. In this study, the link between current fitness levels of potential hikers and actual exertion on hiking trails is investigated. In particular, we investigated whether simple, pre-hike fitness tests (Step-up and Cooper tests) could be used to predict physical exertion on two graded hiking trails (Trail 1: graded easy; Trail 2: graded moderate). Fifty participants completed the pre-hike fitness tests and the two hiking trails. Correlations between relevant sets of variables were calculated, together with the associated p-value. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models followed by model selection were used to investigate if the exertion levels on the two trails, as characterised by the minimum heart rate (HR), mean HR and maximum HR at the end of the trail, could be predicted by the pre-hike fitness tests. A statistical model was created that predicts the mean HR and maximum HR of hikers undertaking an easy and a moderate hike; the Step-up test best predicted mean and maximum HR on Trial 1, and maximum HR on Trail 2, while the combination of Step-up and Cooper tests best predicted mean HR on Trail 2. Park managers are continuously looking to implement new and novel techniques that will increase customer enjoyment, while simultaneously minimise customer risk. By using an accurate predictive model such as the one proposed, managers can improve users' experiences. Satisfied customers are more likely to return to these facilities and positive reviews may increase facility usage.

Research topics

  • Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
  • Physical Education and Pedagogy

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2024.100760

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.