article · Lakes & Reservoirs Science Policy and Management for Sustainable Use
ABSTRACT Fish biodiversity was assessed as a biological indicator of aquatic environmental quality across six wetlands of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. A total of 1616 fish specimens, representing 18 species, four genera and three families, were collected. Labeobarbus intermedius (23.1%–48.9%) and L. brevicephalus (6.7%–44.4%) were the most abundant, whereas L. beso , L. gorguari and L. truttiformis were least common (0%–6.7%). Spatially, Clarias gariepinus dominated at Megech River Mouth (9.4%), and Oreochromis niloticus was abundant at Wonjeta (54.5%) and Ras Abbay (62.5%). Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) ranged from below the detection limit to 110.0 fish/h. The Fish Index of Biotic Integrity (FIBI) and Habitat Quality Index (HQI) varied significantly, with the highest FIBI values at Gumara and Megech River Mouths (39.0) and HQI scores peaking at Zewdie Girar (19.0) and Wonjeta (18.5). Multivariate analyses grouped wetlands into three distinct clusters based on the fish assemblage structure: Cluster 1 (Wonjeta, Ras Abbay and Avaj), Cluster 2 (Zewdie Girar and Gumara River Mouth) and Cluster 3 (Megech River Mouth). Principal Component Analysis explained 80.6% of the total variation, whereas Canonical Correspondence Analysis accounted for 98.5% of the variance in fish–environment relationships, identifying water depth, Secchi depth, ammonia, phosphorus and nitrate as key drivers of environmental degradation. Margalef's richness and Hill's diversity indices varied significantly among wetlands, reflecting spatial differences, but showed no significant seasonal variation. Functional feeding group distribution exhibited seasonal shifts, especially among benthic, tolerant and detritivorous species. These findings underscore the ecological importance of Lake Tana's wetlands and the need for targeted conservation measures to sustain fish diversity and habitat integrity.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1111/lre.70014
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.