MARATTO

article

Fine-Tuning GPT on Biomedical NLP Tasks: An Empirical Evaluation

202417 citationsAl Akhawayn University

Abstract

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has marked a transformative era in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), propelling AI capabilities to unprecedented heights. LLMs, exemplified by models like GPT-3, GPT-4, or Galactica, have demonstrated extraordinary aptitude for under-standing and generating human-like text. What makes OpenAI's GPT-3 models and beyond stand out is their impressive per-formance using in-context learning, allowing them to effectively tackle tasks with minimal examples or context. This adaptability highlights GPT-3's versatility, making it a dominant force in various NLP applications. However, recent studies have revealed certain limitations and weaknesses in GPT-3, particularly in more specific domains, such as the biomedical field, where it exhibits lower performance under few-shot settings in tasks like named entity recognition (NER) or question answering (QA) compared to smaller language models. Thus, this paper aims to fine-tune GPT-3 as a general-purpose language model using biomedical data and assess its performance across seven different biomedical natural language processing tasks: named entity recognition, relation extraction, question answering, document classification, relation classification, text similarity, and molecular property prediction. We demonstrate that the fine-tuned GPT-3 models excel in tasks such as question answering and document classi-fication while lagging behind state-of-the-art models in others. These results prompt significant consideration of the potential benefits of fine-tuning, pre-training with domain-specific data, or even augmenting the model to improve overall performance.

Research topics

  • Topic Modeling
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1109/iccece58645.2024.10497313

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.