review · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
INTRODUCTION: Preeclampsia (PE) is a significant obstetric and global health concern associated with fetal growth restriction, poor placental perfusion, and maternal organ dysfunction. Early detection through simple, routine antenatal indicators is essential. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed fibrinogen (FIB) and D-dimer (DD) levels in PE patients compared to normotensive pregnant women. METHODS: statistics and the Cochrane Q test, while subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. Additionally, sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Furthermore, Egger's regression test and funnel plot were utilized to evaluate publication bias among the included studies. RESULTS: In total, 31 articles involving 5,846 participants were included in this study. Among these, 2,938 were identified as patients with PE (664 severe PE, 619 mild PE, and 1,655 undefined PE), while 2,908 were normotensive pregnant mothers. The overall pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for FIB and DD between PE and normotensive pregnant mothers were 0.26 (95% CI: -0.12-0.64, p = 0.18) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.43-1.18, p < 0.001), respectively. These findings suggest a significant increase in DD levels among PE patients compared to normotensive pregnant mothers, while the elevation in FIB levels among PE patients did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the potential utility of DD as a biomarker for identifying and monitoring PE during pregnancy. However, further research is warranted to elucidate the clinical implications and predictive value of DD levels in the context of PE diagnosis and management. Additionally, the non-significant difference in FIB levels highlights the need for continued investigation into the underlying mechanisms and diagnostic relevance of FIB in PE.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07964-8
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.