MARATTO

article · European journal of applied sciences

Fibre-Vessel Structure, Density and Moisture Content Analysis of Zanthoxylum gilletii Wood with Comparative Evaluation Against Enthandrophragma cylindricum for Furniture Use

Abstract

The density of wood is among several factors that influence the strength and durability of wood. However, scanty research is carried out on the effect of anatomical characteristics of wood. Fibre and vessels were sampled from three Ghanaian timbers, Zanthoxylum gilletii (Okuo) and Enthandrophragma cylindricum (Sapele) each. The study performed is to assess some key measurements; fibre length (FL), vessel diameter (VD), fibre diameter (FD), fibre lumen width (FLW), and fibre wall thickness (FWT) and density of wood of the selected tree. Results indicated highly significant (p<0.05) (Table 2) Specific variations revealed that Z. gilletii has the greatest fibre-vessel content and high density than E. cylindricum but was less moisture content to E. cylindricum. In terms of density, Z. gilletii ranged from 716 to 842 kg/m³, exceeding E. cylindricum range of 640 to 758 kg/m³ (Fig. 1). Fibre diameter for E. cylindricum ranged from 19.35 to 24.12 µm, whereas Z. gilletii showed slightly narrower fibres between 18.99 and 19.58 µm (Table 1). Overall, the denser, vessel-rich anatomy of Z. gilletii indicated a its high strength to buttress its potentials as a durable and efficient substitute for E. cylindricum and some well-known timber species (WKS) in furniture and structural applications. The higher density of Z. gilletii, combined with its lower moisture content, suggests enhanced resistance to fungal and insect damage and mechanical strength.

Research topics

  • Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Bamboo properties and applications
  • Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.14738/aivp.1306.19631

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.