article
In the digital age, online reviews playa critical role in influencing consumer decisions and business reputations. How-ever, the prevalence of fake reviews undermines the credibility of online platforms. In this study, we propose a new method based on the use of extravagant words as indicators of fake reviews, leveraging their tendency to exaggerate and manipulate readers. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach by comparing three distinct methods: K-means, K-mode, and Hierarchical clustering. Utilizing two comprehensive datasets, we preprocess the data, extract features, and implement the tree classification methods. Additionally, we incorporate BERT for improved feature extraction. The performance of each method is assessed using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and Fl-score. Our findings reveal significant insights into the utility of extravagant words and BERT in distinguishing fake reviews and highlight the comparative strengths and weaknesses of K-means, K-modes and Hierarchical clustering. This study provides a novel approach to enhance review authenticity verification, with implications for improving consumer trust and platform integrity.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/icecce63537.2024.10823434
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.