article · Journal of Urologic Oncology
Purpose: This study aims to identify determinants of pericardial effusion (PCE) in patients with renal cancer and predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with renal cancer and PCE.Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using National Inpatient Sample of patients with primary malignant renal cancer data from 2016–2020. A total of 85,288 patients were included in the analysis, of which 763 (0.90%) presented with PCE. The main outcomes of interest were the presence of PCE and the in-hospital mortality rate in patients with renal cancer and PCE.Results: The majority of our cohort are aged ≥40 years (96.79%) and males (64.57%). In the bivariate analysis, patients <40 years had higher odds of PCE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–2.63). Non-Hispanic Black (aOR, 1.59; 95% CI ,1.30–1.94) and Hispanic patients were associated with an increased odd of PCE odds ratio. Higher Elixhauser comorbidity index (≥4: aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.66–3.08), hypoproteinemia (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22–1.81), heart failure (aOR, 2.15; 95% CI 1.83–2.55), metastatic disease (aOR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15–1.62), and severe disease presentation (aOR, 6.35; 95% CI, 4.82–8.36) were also significant predictors of PCE. Private insurance was associated with higher PCE odds (aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20–1.70). Among PCE patients, the in-hospital mortality rate was 13.37%. Self-pay insurance status (aOR, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.05–13.95), metastatic disease (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.07–2.96), and severe disease presentation (aOR, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.05–8.58) significantly predicted increased mortality.Conclusion: This study identifies crucial demographic, clinical, and healthcare system factors associated with PCE and in-hospital mortality in renal cancer patients. These findings highlight the need for increased vigilance and tailored surveillance for vulnerable groups and those with higher comorbidity burdens.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.22465/juo.255000420021
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.