article · International Journal of Image and Data Fusion
Accurate and up-to-date information on urban built-up areas is significant for managing urban growth and development. Earth Observation (EO) data are valuable sources for meeting this demand. However, the extraction of urban built-up areas from EO data is challenging due to the limitations of EO data sources. To overcome this challenge, this study follows an approach that assesses the performance of optical (Sentinel-2), radar (Sentinel-1) and fused (Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2) data to extract urban built-up areas using machine learning algorithms including Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and KDTree KNN. The results were statistically analyzed by considering the Overall Accuracy (OA) and kappa coefficient. In addition, 15 cm GSD (Ground Sample Distance) aerial photography of the study area was used to validate the results. According to the results, Sentinel-2 produced better representation and accuracy of urban built-up areas than Sentinel-1 and even the fused image. Regarding to machine learning algorithms classification performance, RF performed better in both OA and Kappa coefficient along all datasets. The research findings can have significant implications for various domains, such as urban planning, land use management and open avenues for further comparisons of different EO data sources and machine learning algorithms for built-up areas extraction.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/19479832.2024.2338736
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.