MARATTO

letter · Movement Disorders Clinical Practice

Extended Phenotype of <i>PEX11B</i> Pathogenic Variants: Ataxia, Tremor, and Dystonia Due to a Novel C.2T &gt; G Variant

20241 citationOpen accessStellenbosch University

Abstract

Peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBD) are usually the result of biallelic pathogenic variants in peroxin (PEX) genes, leading to generalized peroxisomal dysfunction due to the abnormal assembly or maintenance of peroxisomes.1 PBD 14B is a subtype of PBDs caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in PEX11Beta (PEX11B), encoding a peroxisomal membrane protein that is involved in the peroxisome division pathway.1 The first patient with a PBD caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in the PEX11B gene was reported in 2012,2 and a case series of 5 patients from 3 families were described in 2017.3 All patients had congenital cataracts and intellectual disability, although dysmorphism, hearing loss, and peripheral neuropathy were variably present. A male patient of European ancestry (III-1 in Fig. 1) with congenital cataracts and intellectual disability developed progressive sensory loss and pain in the limbs from the age of 24. At the age of 34, he developed abnormal movements in all 4 limbs and became wheelchair bound from the age of 36. On examination at the age of 43 he had a high-amplitude postural tremor of the upper limbs with an associated rest component, and there were unusual tremulous movements in the legs, with superimposed myoclonic jerks. Marked anterocollis and dystonic posturing of the hands were also present as shown in Video 1. He had gaze-evoked nystagmus, symmetric weakness in all limbs, lower-limb areflexia, and a glove-stocking pattern of sensory loss for pinprick. Limited nerve conduction studies of the upper limbs at the age of 24 showed bilateral median neuropathies, and brain magnetic resonance imaging showed generalized atrophy involving the supra- and infratentorial brain regions equally. His younger sister (III-2 in Fig. 1) had congenital cataracts and cognitive decline from age 5 and developed autonomic dysfunction, hearing impairment, and epilepsy in her twenties. No tremor or ataxia was noticed by her or her parents, but on examination at the age of 41 she had gaze-evoked nystagmus, ataxic dysarthria, limb and gait ataxia, and a mild action tremor. She also had sensorineural hearing loss, symmetric weakness in all limbs, generalized areflexia, a glove-stocking pattern of sensory loss for pinprick, and an abnormal vibration sense and proprioception at the toes and ankles. Biochemical analysis performed in her early thirties showed a marginally increased C26:0 level and C26:0/C22:0 ratio, and normal phytanic and pristanic acid levels. Imaging and electrodiagnostic testing were not performed as she was examined at her institutional residence. The parents were nonconsanguineous and unaffected, but there was a family history of a similar condition in 2 deceased cousins (siblings, II-6 and II-7) on the maternal side of the family (Fig. 1). Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed by Macrogen Europe (Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and raw WES data were analyzed as previously described.4 Both patients were found to be homozygous for the NM_003846.3:c.2T > G (p.Met1?) variant within exon 1 (chr1.hg38:145918687A > C) of the PEX11B gene. Sanger sequencing confirmed the homozygous presence of this variant in both patients, whereas the mother (II-2) was heterozygous (Fig. S1). DNA from the father (II-1) was not available for segregation analysis (deceased). PBDs generally present as severe neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood. However, the availability of advanced diagnostic testing, including WES, has led to the diagnosis of several patients with late-onset PBDs, with fewer and less-severe clinical features and no or marginal biochemical aberrations.5-7 Five pathogenic variants in PEX11B have previously been described, four of which are single-nucleotide variants and one a deletion of exons 1 to 3.2, 3, 8 Based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria,9 the novel homozygous PEX11B variant identified in our family can be classified as likely pathogenic, as it is a start loss (null) variant in a gene where loss of function is a known mechanism of disease, and is present at extremely low frequency in population databases. In addition, this variant is in a highly conserved region, and multiple in silico prediction tools (eg, CADD version 1.7, SIFT, and PROVEAN) suggest pathogenicity. Although the distant relatives could not be examined, it is highly likely that they had the same condition. The 2 patients described in this report presented with congenital cataracts (which appears to be a consistent early feature of the PEX11B-related PBDs),2, 3 intellectual disability, and peripheral neuropathy. In addition, a complex movement disorder consisting of postural and action tremor, neck and limb dystonia, limb myoclonus, and ataxia was present in the proband, and ataxia and a mild action tremor in the sibling, a phenomenon that has not previously been described in PBDs. Although these movements may be unusual for this condition, it is also possible that the movement disorder manifests only at a later age. Indeed, whereas the oldest previously described patient with a PBD was 26 years of age,2 the movement disorder was noticed in our proband at the age of 34 and an asymptomatic tremor was present in the sibling at the age of 41. It would be interesting to note whether a movement disorder develops in any of the previously described cases on long-term follow-up. F.H.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A K.N.: 1B, 1C, 2B C.J.R.: 1C, 2B J.V.: 1B, 1C, 2B N.D.: 1C, 2B F.L.: 1C, 2B M.D.: 1C, 2B L.A.W.: 1B, 1C, 2B F.W.: 1C, 2B M.M.R.: 1B, 2B H.H.: 1B, 1C, 2B M.G.H.: 1B, 2B J.C.: 1C, 2A, 2B Ethical Compliance Statement: This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University. Written informed consent for study participation was provided by the legal guardian (parent) of the patients. In addition, the legal guardian reviewed and provided written informed consent for use of the video recording. We confirm that we have read the journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines. Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest: This work was supported by an MRC strategic award to establish the International Centre for Genomic Medicine in Neuromuscular Diseases (ICGNMD) MR/S005021/1. Fellowship for Kireshnee Naidu was funded by the Guarantors of Brain (UK Charity 1197319). The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. Financial Disclosures for the Previous 12 Months: Christopher J. Record was supported by the National Institutes of Neurological Diseases and Stroke and Office of Rare Diseases (U54NS065712). Mary M. Reilly was supported by the Wellcome Trust (G104817), the National Institutes of Neurological Diseases and Stroke and Office of Rare Diseases (U54NS065712 and 1UOINS109403-01), the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA510281), the Charcot Marie Tooth Association (CMTA), the Harrington Discovery Institute, and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Applied Therapeutics. The rest of the authors have no additional disclosures to report. None. Figure S1. Result of Sanger sequencing in the proband (III-1, electropherogram A), the sibling (III-2, electropherogram B), and mother (II-2, electropherogram C) illustrating the c.2T > G start loss variant. The bottom electropherogram (D) is from an unaffected control, and the reference sequence is shown at the top. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Research topics

  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14178

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.