MARATTO

article · Journal of Education and e-Learning Research

Exploring the intentions of science teacher candidates to implement computational thinking in their future classroom: A case study

Abstract

The education system across countries is evolving as students and teachers are increasingly exposed to relevant technologies and innovative pedagogies through both plugged and unplugged activities to promote computational thinking. This paper examines the factors influencing preservice teachers' intentions to integrate computational thinking into their future teaching practices. A total of 164 preservice teachers from the University of Education in Southern Nigeria participated in the research. The analysis employed partial least squares structural equation modeling to explore the relationships among six latent variables identified in this study: perceived usefulness, ease of use, attitude toward computational thinking, behavioral control, subjective norm, and behavioral intention. The findings indicate that the proposed model explains 74.4% of the variance in preservice teachers' intentions to teach computational thinking in their classrooms. Additionally, the results demonstrate that attitude toward computational thinking, perceived behavioral control, ease of use, and usefulness significantly and positively influence preservice teachers' intentions to adopt computational thinking in their future educational practices. However, subjective norms did not significantly predict the intention of teacher candidates to apply computational thinking to their planned teaching practices. The authors discuss these results in the context of integrating computational thinking into educational settings and recommend directions for future research.

Research topics

  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Gender and Technology in Education

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.20448/jeelr.v13i2.8333

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.