MARATTO

article · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry

Exploring structural, optoelectronic, and thermoelectric properties of <scp>SrCaGe</scp> and <scp>SrCaSn</scp> half Heusler compounds

Abstract

Abstract Making products that are affordable, environmentally friendly, and energy‐efficient is the main objective of modern production. The objective of this research is to discover compounds that meet these parameters. The full‐potential, linearized augmented plane wave program (FP LAPW) offered by Wien2K was used to examine the structural, optical, electrical, and transport aspects of SrCaGe and SrCaSn Half‐Heusler (HHs) compounds. Generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was considered for the structural optimization and computation of elastic properties signifies inherent ductility and mechanical stability of the examined SrCaGe and SrCaSn compounds. Additionally, both materials were found to possess a direct bandgap and exhibit semiconducting behavior. The bandgap magnitudes obtained utilizing the modified Becke‐Johnson (mBJ) approximation are 0.78 and 0.52 eV for SrCaGe and SrCaSn, respectively. According to their optical characteristics, SrCaGe and SrCaSn show potential for application in optoelectronic components. Furthermore, the transport properties are evaluated by BoltzTrap program, revealing that both SrCaGe and SrCaSn exhibit figures of merit (ZT) values nearly equal to one at room temperature. This suggests their potential use in creating thermoelectric devices with highly efficient performance. The simulation study demonstrates the promising attributes of SrCaGe and SrCaSn HHs materials, positioning them as viable candidates for various applications, aligned with the goals of sustainable and efficient manufacturing.

Research topics

  • Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties
  • Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
  • MXene and MAX Phase Materials

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/qua.27375

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.