MARATTO

preprint · Research Square

Exploring risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse at eastern of Democratic Republic of Congo: A case-control study

Abstract

Abstract Background : Pelvic organ prolapse is a common debilitating condition worldwide. Despite treatment, its recurrence can reach up to 30%. It has multiple risk factors, some of which are particular for a low-resource settings. The identification these factors would help to devise risk models allowing the development of prevention policies. The objective of this study was to explore risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse in a population in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Methods: This was an unmatched case-control study conducted between January 2021 and January 2022. The sample size was estimated to be a total of 434 women (217 with prolapse as cases and 217 without prolapse as controls). Data comparisons were made using the Chi-Square and Student T tests . Binary and multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine associated factors. A p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Variables identified as definitive predictors of pelvic organ prolapse included low BMI (p=0.004, aOR 2.991 IC 1.419-6.307), home birth (p<0,001 aOR 6.102, IC 3.526-10.561 ), family history of POP (p=0.023, aOR 2.085, IC 1.107-3.924), history of episiotomy (p=0, aOR 3.504, IC 2.031-6.048), height ≤ 150 cm (p<0,001 aOR 5.328, IC 2.942-9.648) and history of giving birth to a macrosomic baby (p=0.018, aOR 1.929, IC 1.121-3.321). Conclusions : This study identified that Body Mass Index and birth-related factors are definitive predictors of pelvic organ prolapse in a low-resource setting. These factors are potentially modifiable and should be targetted in any future pelvic organ prolapse prevention policy. Additionally, there seems to be a genetic predisposition for prolapse, which warrants further assessment in specifically designed large scale studies.

Research topics

  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3322427/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.